Hutchinson Kansas Newspaper

collapse
Home / Daily News Analysis / Two crime families do not make an honest town

Two crime families do not make an honest town

Jul 28, 2026  Twila Rosenbaum 5 views
Two crime families do not make an honest town

In tribal politics, we are not supposed to raise this. Someone should, and the truth does not care about your feelings. Republicans built a decade-long movement on two promises: drain the swamp, and expose the Biden Crime Family. That investigation established Biden relatives took more than $10 million from foreign sources but never tied a payment to an official act. Set that standard against this administration’s own disclosures. The men who promised to drain the swamp are cashing in.

The Crypto Windfall

Start with crypto. President Donald Trump’s 2026 disclosure put his income above $2 billion last year, $1.4 billion of it from crypto. World Liberty Financial, co-founded by Trump and his sons, routes 75% of token proceeds to the family; he reported over $500 million from those sales alone. The $TRUMP memecoin peaked near $15 billion, then fell more than 90%, wiping out its buyers while the family kept the gains. Its top 220 holders got a black-tie dinner; the top 25 got the president. The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board called it “cashing in on the Presidency in big and sketchy ways.” The phenomenon exemplifies how public office can be leveraged for personal enrichment, a stark contrast to the anti-corruption rhetoric that propelled Trump to victory in 2016.

Foreign Money and Conflicts

Then there is the foreign money, where swamp becomes sale. An Abu Dhabi state fund chaired by the UAE’s national security adviser put $2 billion of World Liberty’s stablecoin into a deal weeks before the White House cleared the UAE to buy advanced American AI chips. Steve Witkoff, the Middle East envoy, co-founded World Liberty and still held an interest while negotiating with the governments investing in it. Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners manages more than $6 billion, 99% foreign, including $2 billion from the Saudi sovereign fund, while he serves as peace envoy to those governments. Not every deal reeks, but the tangle is the danger. The New York Times counts nearly 30 foreign ventures tied personally to this president, unlike any before him. The sheer volume of these arrangements creates an unprecedented web of potential conflicts, where a foreign government's investment in a Trump family venture could be perceived as an attempt to influence U.S. policy.

Selective Justice

Meanwhile, the Justice Department, at Trump’s direction, is investigating ActBlue over a few hundred small foreign card transactions. You cannot chase the trickle while opening the floodgate on your own side. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s old firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, now run by his sons, manages reserves for the stablecoin giant Tether. One day after Lutnick moved his stake into a trust for his children, Tether lent that trust money. Donald Trump Jr. took $300,000 in free Kalshi equity while advising its rival Polymarket, and federal enforcement actions against both firms vanished. The president pardoned Binance founder Changpeng Zhao, whose exchange helped build World Liberty’s stablecoin. This pattern of dropping investigations into allies while targeting political opponents erodes the credibility of federal law enforcement and raises questions about the independence of the Justice Department.

Prediction Market Scandals

Prediction markets carry a second problem. An Army soldier has been charged with using classified intelligence about the Maduro operation to win $400,000 on Polymarket. The New York Times found more than eighty accounts placing well-timed wagers, some hours before strikes on Iran. The soldier will be punished. Men in the president’s orbit will be pardoned, and some will excuse it with, “Joe Biden pardoned people, too.” The disparity in accountability further fuels public cynicism. If the government selectively enforces laws based on political allegiance, honest citizens lose faith in the system entirely.

The Trust Deficit

Here is what gets lost in the scorekeeping. It does not matter whether each arrangement is legal. The swamp was never a legal problem; it was a trust problem. When access to a president can be bought with a memecoin and a black-tie ticket, every ambitious operator learns the spoils go to whoever holds power and restraint is for suckers. Only 17% of Americans trust the federal government to do right most of the time, and two-thirds call it corrupt. Each deal confirms the cynic and drives honest people out. If the game is rigged, why play it clean? A spoils system enriches the connected, attracts the worst, and repels everyone else. The answer to a rival’s corruption was never to match it and call the ledger even. Two crime families do not make an honest town.

Heading into the midterms, Democrats can tell independents that a government this entangled with foreign money needs more oversight, not less. Voters notice when the referee is on the take. If we meant what we said in 2016, the test applies to us: no foreign money to the president’s family while that government awaits a decision; no regulators dropping cases against companies the first family owns; no betting on state secrets; real divestment, not divestment to your children. Drain the swamp. Don’t just recycle the water for our side.

Beyond the immediate scandals, the broader implications for democratic governance are profound. The original promise of draining the swamp resonated with millions who felt the system was rigged against them. Now, the very leader who rode that wave is enmeshed in a web of personal financial interests that appear to benefit from his position. The contrast is not lost on voters, who see a president using the office to enrich himself and his family while simultaneously dismantling ethics safeguards and targeting critics. This has created a crisis of legitimacy that goes beyond partisan politics. If the government cannot police itself, the public will eventually look for alternatives outside the system, further destabilizing an already fragile democracy.

The historical context of the Biden family investigations provides a crucial benchmark. The House Oversight Committee spent years probing Hunter Biden's foreign business deals, ultimately finding no direct evidence that Joe Biden took actions to benefit his son's clients. Yet the perception of corruption was enough to fuel a political movement. Today, the evidence of Trump family financial entanglements is far more direct: a president who personally profited from cryptocurrency ventures promoted by his own administration, who appointed family members to key positions while their private companies do business with foreign governments, and who has used the Justice Department to protect his allies and punish his enemies. The double standard is glaring, and the damage to public trust is cumulative.

The role of social media and partisan news outlets in shaping public perception cannot be overstated. While outlets like Fox News have largely ignored or downplayed the Trump family's financial disclosures, alternative media on the left has amplified them. This media polarization means that many Americans remain unaware of the extent of the president's business dealings, or dismiss them as politically motivated attacks. The result is a fragmented public discourse where facts are less important than tribal loyalty. The challenge for journalists and editors is to present these facts in a way that transcends partisan divisions, focusing on the core democratic principles at stake: transparency, accountability, and the rule of law.

Ultimately, the question before the American people is whether they still believe in the ideals they professed in 2016. The swamp was not just a metaphor for corruption; it was a call for a more honest and ethical government. If that call is to mean anything, it must apply equally to both parties and all presidents. The current administration's actions suggest a different priority: using the machinery of government to enrich a few at the expense of many. This is not draining the swamp; it is building a gated community within it. And as the gap between the connected and the ordinary widens, the erosion of trust will continue until the very foundation of representative government is threatened.


Source:Times Republican News


Share:

Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies Cookie Policy